MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: Problems with my

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg58154] Re: [mg58115] Re: Problems with my
  • From: "David Annetts" <davidannetts at>
  • Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 05:21:30 -0400 (EDT)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at

Hi David,

> > 
> Even Fortran has a LOGICAL data type!

Yes it does.  And modern versions (> F90) allow users to define their own
types in terms of fundamental data types, improving readability & code even

However, the usual way that this sort of thing is coded in Fortran (usually
F77), is as a series of cryptic arguments to subroutines (eg LinPack);
logical variables are rarely used, but I'm happy to be contradicted.  

My point was that while this can be done in Mathematica, a better way might
be to use options & logical variables such as 

	PlotJoined->True, PrintOutput->False, 

Or even

	ShowWorking->False, Brief or All.

Advantages are readability & ease of use since the options can be used in
any order & in some cases, omitted entirely.



  • Prev by Date: Re: Nested Commutators
  • Next by Date: Converting a 3F2 to elementary functions
  • Previous by thread: Re: lists of variables
  • Next by thread: Converting a 3F2 to elementary functions