MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: (presumably) easy AspectRatio question

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg58388] Re: (presumably) easy AspectRatio question
  • From: dbsearch04 at
  • Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 04:37:23 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <><d9tcmk$37f$>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at

Thanks Jeff.

I tried this. The effect is less pronounced, but when I run this
(including *AspectRatio -> Automatic* on both Show[] commands), I see
the following artifact.

On the unrotated rectangle, the bottom side is about 300 pixels and

On the rotated rectangle, the bottom side is only about 100 pixels (and
angled 30 degrees of course).

This is very curious. I will keep experimenting with other

Jeff Bryant wrote:
> You should make sure to set both the first and the last graphic to the
> same AspectRatio.  Try this:
> <snipped/>

  • Prev by Date: Weird behavior of SparseArray
  • Next by Date: Square-root Kalman Information filter
  • Previous by thread: Re: (presumably) easy AspectRatio question
  • Next by thread: Re: (presumably) easy AspectRatio question