MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: letrec/named let

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg56766] Re: [mg56707] letrec/named let
  • From: DrBob <drbob at bigfoot.com>
  • Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 06:02:54 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <200505040433.AAA06220@smc.vnet.net>
  • Reply-to: drbob at bigfoot.com
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

I have no idea what "named let" does -- not a hell of a lot, I suspect -- but here's a simple replacement for the other routine:

CompressNumericalSequence[s_List]:=Ordering@Ordering@s
CompressNumericalSequence@{10,2,4,7,8}

{5,1,2,3,4}

Bobby

On Wed, 4 May 2005 00:33:53 -0400 (EDT), Daniel Roy <droy at mit.edu> wrote:

> hi.  i'm a lisper/schemer and i'm working with mathematica.  i
> appreciate the lisp-like nature of mathematica but i can't seem to
> easily replicate some of the functionality i like which is forcing me to
> write ugly side-effect code.
>
> for instance, how do you do the equivalent of a "named let" in
> mathematica (NOTE! I know i can take the max of a list, this is just a
> simple example of a named let)
>
> (define (max-of-list lst)
>   (let loop ((lst (cdr lst))
>              (best (car lst)))
>     (if (null? lst)
>         best
>         (loop (cdr lst)
>               (if (> (car lst) best)
>                   (car lst)
>                   best)))))
>(max-of-list '(1 2 3 4 5 2))
>> 5
>
> Here is a mathematica function to compress a sequence numerically.
> here is one attempt using functions where i pass the function to
> itself... there has to be a better way
>
> CompressNumericalSequence[S_] := Module[
>       {C = Function[{C, R, i},
>             If[i < Max[R],
>               If[Length[Position[R, i]] == 0,
>                 C[C, (If[# > i, # - 1, #]) & /@ R, i],
>                 C[C, R, i + 1]],
>               R]]},
>       C[C, S, 1]];
>
> CompressNumericalSequence[{10, 2, 4, 7, 8}]
> {5, 1, 2, 3, 4}
>
> Also, is it possible to do letrec in mathematica?  (essentially, i know
> i can do recursive function declarations at the top level... my question
> is whether i can do them at lower levels?)...
>
> thanks, dan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
DrBob at bigfoot.com


  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: debugging
  • Next by Date: Re: books on writing packages
  • Previous by thread: letrec/named let
  • Next by thread: Re: letrec/named let