Re: Nestwhile

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg57234] Re: [mg57201] Nestwhile*From*: DrBob <drbob at bigfoot.com>*Date*: Sat, 21 May 2005 02:40:25 -0400 (EDT)*References*: <EC9C79ED705B7D498CE6892836AA3CAABA6EF4@EAHQ-CSMB9.rws.ad.ea.com> <428E0483.1090906@umbc.edu>*Reply-to*: drbob at bigfoot.com*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

NestWhile still needs functions for its first and third arguments, Return is still a waste of keystrokes, you're still not nesting anything (so While is indicated), et cetera. Sorting twice in defining c is pointless, and I wonder if Sort is doing what you think, at all; it sorts symbolic expressions when used this way (ditto for cpp, uo, uop, uopp, deltaA), not the numbers. Hence, the various vectors may not be consistently sorted in a way that matches your intentions. For instance, cpp isn't the derivative of cp, as you probably intended. You could have set cpp[j_]=D[cp[j], t] Similarly for uop and uopp (first and second derivative of a vector dotted with Ao). You have the first vector of the dot product wrong at least for uop, I suspect. In uopp things may accidentally sort properly, but you shouldn't count on it. (I'm guessing your true intentions and may be wrong, of course.) I notice you're defining but not using deltaA[j_] and delA[j_]. Just as well, too, as they'd be hard to work with. There's also no point in using Simplify on real numbers, as I think you're doing in several of the functions; numbers don't simplify. Bobby On Fri, 20 May 2005 11:38:43 -0400, Pratik Desai <pdesai1 at umbc.edu> wrote: > Barthelet, Luc wrote: > >> I am not sure NestWhile is really what you need here. >> >> I create a notebook for your function. There are a couple of typos in >> the function below I think. (w rather than dw?) there are also a lot of >> terms equal to 0. >> You function is d[e,dw]=... it probably needs to be d[e_,de_]:=... >> >> You can see the html version of the notebook at: >> http://www.mathematica-users.org/webMathematica/wiki/wiki.jsp?pageName=N >> otebook:functionMathgroup57201.nb >> >> and you can download the notebook at: >> http://www.mathematica-users.org/mediawiki/images/8/83/functionMathgroup >> 57201.nb >> >> I suggest you upload your notebook at http://www.mathematica-users.org >> and that would give us more information to help you quickly. >> >> Cheers, >> Luc >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Pratik Desai [mailto:pdesai1 at umbc.edu] To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net >> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 1:44 AM >> Subject: [mg57234] [mg57201] Nestwhile >> >> Hi, >> I am having problem with using NestWhile in a code which basically boils >> >> down to finding values for the variables (e,dw) for which a function >> d[e, dw] is "minimized" while one variable (e) goes up to 1. I have been >> >> using the following approach, which unfortunately loops for 1 >> iteration..There is definitely a better probably a simpler way to do >> this...Thanks in advance for your help >> >> Here is the attempt : >> >> d[ e, dw] = >> Abs[0. + 1143.8189785870038/((-2.0224920432639264 + >> e)*(22.50249204326393 + e)) + >> (e^3*(-2.3561944901923435 - >> 1.3322676295501878*^-15*w))/((-2.0224920432639264 + >> e)*(22.50249204326393 + e)) - >> 56.548667764616276*w - (2573.5927018207585*dw)/((-2.0224920432639264 >> + e)*(22.50249204326393 + e)) + >> (e^2*(-73.38760438785755 + >> 56.54866776461624*dw))/((-2.0224920432639264 + e)*(22.50249204326393 + >> e)) + >> (e*(-407.4855111216201 + >> 1158.1167158193412*dw))/((-2.0224920432639264 + e)*(22.50249204326393 + >> e))] + >> 8.*Abs[0. + 0./((-2.0224920432639264 + e)*(22.50249204326393 + e)) + >> (0.*dw)/((-2.0224920432639264 + e)*(22.50249204326393 + e)) + >> e^2*(0./((-2.0224920432639264 + e)*(22.50249204326393 + e)) + >> (0.*dw)/((-2.0224920432639264 + e)* >> (22.50249204326393 + e))) + e*(0. + 0./((-2.0224920432639264 + >> e)*(22.50249204326393 + e)) + >> (0.*dw)/((-2.0224920432639264 + e)*(22.50249204326393 + e)))] + >> Abs[0. + (e*(-107.23302924253159 - >> 7.105427357601*^-14*dw))/((-2.0224920432639264 + e)*(22.50249204326393 + >> >> e)) + >> (e^3*(2.3561944901923453 - >> 4.440892098500626*^-16*dw))/((-2.0224920432639264 + >> e)*(22.50249204326393 + e)) + >> e^2*(48.25486315913923/((-2.0224920432639264 + e)*(22.50249204326393 >> + e)) + >> (0.*dw)/((-2.0224920432639264 + e)*(22.50249204326393 + e)))] >> >> Module[{e = 0.05, dw = 0.04}, NestWhile[{e += 0.01,dw += 0.1}, >> d[ e, dw],10^-2 <d[ e, dw] <0&&e==1 ]; Print[dw,d[ e, dw],e]; >> Return[d[j, e, dw], Module]] >> >> 0.14 >> 25.415 >> >> >> > Hi Luc and Dr.Bob > As you can probably tell I am not much of a coder. Since in most cases > (hopefully)you turn to the group as a last resort I tried to compose > the email as I was just stepping out and you can see the results :-[ . > Regardless as Luc suggested I have imported my file on wiki Here is the > link to the mathematica file: > > http://www.mathematica-users.org/mediawiki/images/d/d4/ihb1.nb > > Luc, > Actually the incrementaion is for two variables e and dw , actually > w=wo+dw, and I already assumed the value for wo . As far as I can see > there are no other typos > > I am trying to solve the set of linear equations > > kdA=r+q*dw (here d stands for the Greek symbol Capital delta) > where r and q are functions of e > So I first symbolically calculate dA then rewrite r=kdA-q*dw try to > minimize r based on the values of e and dw. The variables corresponding > to the minimum of the norm of r will give me the coeficients dA...that > was the general idea anyway > > Thank you for your quick response > > Best regards, > Pratik > -- DrBob at bigfoot.com

**Re: Nestwhile**

**Re: four approaches to do a simple sum**

**Re: Nestwhile**

**Re: Nestwhile**