Re: Complex Oddity

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg57535] Re: Complex Oddity
• From: "John Reed" <nospamjreed at alum.mit.edu>
• Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 05:00:21 -0400 (EDT)
• References: <d79enu\$lbl\$1@smc.vnet.net>
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

```Thanks to all who explained what is happening and how to work this problem
correctly.  Now I know one facet of working with complex numbers.  I don't
was my fault for not reading the documentation closely enough.  This problem
came up in the book "Mathematica for Physics" second edition by Zimmerman
and Olness.  They solve a problem using the Complex[a_,b_]->a rule, ( see
page 91) but not the b part.  The b part was my idea.  Now I know why they
didn't solve for the imaginary part this way.  They get the imaginary part
by subtracting the real part from the complex expression and dividing by I.
How many other gotchas are hidden in the code, waiting to bite the unwary
problem or do I just have to find them for myself by hopefully catching the
errors as they occur?

John Reed

"John Reed" <nospamjreed at alum.mit.edu> wrote in message
news:d79enu\$lbl\$1 at smc.vnet.net...
>I was trying to separate the real and imaginary parts of a complicated
> expression, and ended up with something strange.  Here is a short version
> of
> what happened.
>
> Let z = x + I y, then realPart = z /. {Complex[a_,b_]->a} gives realPart =
> x.  Great!
>
> Now, try imagPart = z /. {Complex[a_,b_]->b}  returns with imagPart = x +
> y.
> Oops
>
> In my original expression, it was harder to see, but the same error was
> occuring.  What I tried first was using Re[z] and Im[z], but then I have
> to
> work with Im[y] and Im[x].  It seems to me two things need to be done
> here.
> First, be able to assign variables so that they always stay real or else
> indicate an error is occuring if they turn out to be complex, and second
> do
> something to avoid errors like the above.  I have to say that I don't
> trust
> Mathematica's answers as much as I did before this came up. Now I feel
> like
> I better have a good idea of what the answer is before I  trust
> Mathematica.
>
> John Reed
>
>

```

• Prev by Date: Re: Two related question. Question 1
• Next by Date: Re: Related quastions. Question 2
• Previous by thread: Re: Complex Oddity
• Next by thread: global fit