Re: Solving an integral in the limit.

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg62417] Re: Solving an integral in the limit.
• From: "Jens-Peer Kuska" <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
• Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 06:27:28 -0500 (EST)
• Organization: Uni Leipzig
• References: <dm11o7\$e0s\$1@smc.vnet.net>
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

```Hi,

when the integrand is extended into the complex plane,
one may be able to compute the defined integral without
finding the undefined integral and take the limit.

Regards
Jens

"Josef Karthauser" <joe at tao.org.uk> schrieb im
Newsbeitrag news:dm11o7\$e0s\$1 at smc.vnet.net...
| I'm having trouble solving a complicated
integral using mathematica,
| and I'm looking for some wisdom on the matter.
|
| The problem can be summarised as follows.
Mathematica can determine
| the solution to,
|
|    Integrate[E^(I*x^2)/ Sqrt[1 + x^2], {x, 0,
Infinity}]
|
| but if I replace the upper bound with a free
variable and take the limit
| as it goes to Infinity mathematica doesn't
manage it,
|
|    Limit[Integrate[E^(I*x^2)/ Sqrt[1 + x^2], {x,
0, a}], a -> Infinity]
|
| Surely it should be able to determine that the
answer is the same as in
| the previous case.  Is there anyway to pursuade
it?
|
| Many thanks,
| Joe
| --
| Josef Karthauser (joe at tao.org.uk)
http://www.josef-k.net/
| FreeBSD (cvs meister, admin and hacker)
http://www.uk.FreeBSD.org/
| Physics Particle Theory (student)
http://www.pact.cpes.sussex.ac.uk/
| ================ An eclectic mix of fact and
theory. =================
|

```

• Prev by Date: Re: Timing of looping operators
• Next by Date: Re: Confusing results with N[expr]?
• Previous by thread: Re: Solving an integral in the limit.
• Next by thread: Re: to XLS