MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: Re: Package development

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg62643] Re: [mg62588] Re: [mg62569] Re: Package development
  • From: "David Park" <djmp at earthlink.net>
  • Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:06:37 -0500 (EST)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Gerry,

Why can't you use line-breaks tabs and spacing in StandardForm expressions
in package notebooks? I do it all the time.

It is the use of comments that is the problem. We don't know their status
and when and how we can or can't use them.

David Park
djmp at earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~djmp/

From: Gerry Flanagan [mailto:flanagan at materials-sciences.com]
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net


I'm surprised by the number of people that say they develop packages
using the notebook interface as an editor. About once a year I give that
a try and decide its hopeless. I'm a big fan of using line-breaks, tabs,
and other pretty-print tricks to add some clarity to the functions. The
automated features in the notebook are clever, but not good enough for
something I want to release within the company. So I end up with
developmental notebooks that feed (copy/paste) a text .m file over time.
BTW, I like a product called UltraEdit for my programming. It allows me
to set up a file of Mathematica keywords so that I can use color syntax
highlighting while editing.
Gerry F.



  • Prev by Date: Re: CostOfPath
  • Next by Date: Strange "little" problem with scaling
  • Previous by thread: Re: Package development
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: Package development