[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Wick like theorem and "symbolic" compilation
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg61099] Re: Wick like theorem and "symbolic" compilation
*From*: Peter Pein <petsie at dordos.net>
*Date*: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 02:39:59 -0400 (EDT)
*References*: <diaaps$ic7$1@smc.vnet.net>
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Alexander schrieb:
> Dear MathGroup!
>
> I wrote simple programm to perform "Wick" expanding.
> Here is the code:
>
> (*St1 - basic function to extract couples of fields from a given list*)
>
> st1[x_] := If[Length[
> x] === 2, Wick[Sequence @@ x], Plus @@
> ReplaceList[List @@ (x), {e___, a_, c___,
> b_, d___} -> Wick[a, b] e c d]];
>
> (* Some transformation rules for this function *)
>
> st1[x_Wick y_] := x st1[y];
> st1[a_ + b_] := st1[a] + st1[b];
>
> (* Formatting rules *)
>
> \!\(\(Format[Wick[x_, y_]] := \(x\ y\)\&^;\)\)
>
> (* Final function *)
>
> WickTheorem[x_] := Expand[Plus @@ FixedPointList[st1, x]] //. a_ +
> b_Integer c_ -> a + c;
>
> Simple example, showing how it works:
>
> In[6]:= WickTheorem[a b c d]
>
> Out[6]:= \!\(\*FormBox[
> RowBox[{\(a\ b\ c\ d\), "+",
> RowBox[{"c", " ",
> FormBox[\(\(a\ b\)\&^\),
> "TraditionalForm"], " ", "d"}], "+",
> RowBox[{"b", " ",
> FormBox[\(\(a\ c\)\&^\),
> "TraditionalForm"], " ", "d"}], "+",
> RowBox[{"a", " ",
> FormBox[\(\(b\ c\)\&^\),
> "TraditionalForm"], " ", "d"}], "+",
> RowBox[{"b", " ", "c", " ",
> FormBox[\(\(a\ d\)\&^\),
> "TraditionalForm"]}], "+",
> RowBox[{
> FormBox[\(\(a\ d\)\&^\),
> "TraditionalForm"], " ",
> FormBox[\(\(b\ c\)\&^\),
> "TraditionalForm"]}], "+",
> RowBox[{"a", " ", "c", " ",
> FormBox[\(\(b\ d\)\&^\),
> "TraditionalForm"]}], "+",
> RowBox[{
> FormBox[\(\(a\ c\)\&^\),
> "TraditionalForm"], " ",
> FormBox[\(\(b\ d\)\&^\),
> "TraditionalForm"]}], "+",
> RowBox[{"a", " ", "b", " ",
> FormBox[\(\(c\ d\)\&^\),
> "TraditionalForm"]}], "+",
> RowBox[{
> FormBox[\(\(a\ b\)\&^\),
> "TraditionalForm"], " ",
> FormBox[\(\(c\ d\)\&^\),
> "TraditionalForm"]}]}], TraditionalForm]\)
>
> Maybe there is more simple and elegant realization of this theorem than
> my code ???
>
> Second question is about optimization.
>
> In current realization, on my Cleleron 1700 (with 128Mb of ram) using
> Mathematica 5.1 for Windows, I have following timings:
>
> In[7]:= WickTheorem[a b c d e f w t] // Timing // Print["Time = ", #[[
> 1]], ", Length = ", Length[#[[2]]]] &
> Out[7]:= Time = 10.688 Second, Length = 764
>
> So, in final expression there was 764 terms and it takes ~10 seconds to
> evaluate them. Input expression contains only 8 fields, with 9 fields
> computation takes a relatively long time,about 600 seconds.
>
> Why so long?
> And what are the ways to reduce this time ?
>
> I have tried to use CompileEvaluate from Experimental package, but this
> doesn't reduce evaluation time greatly.
>
> Resuming, second question sounds like:
> Should I rewrite the program in more elegant and efficient way to
> reduce
> evaluation time or there is "symbolic" compilation technique to do
> that?
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> Alexander.
>
Hi Alexander,
there's only one rule necessary, because Wick[x,y] is not a symbol.
Off[General::spell1];
wickrule={c___,a_Symbol,d___, b_Symbol ,e___}->{ c, d ,e,Wick[a,b]};
WickTheorem[p_Times]:=
(Plus@@Times@@@Union@@
NestWhileList[Flatten[(ReplaceList[#,wickrule]&)/@#,1]&,
{List@@p},{}=!=#&]
)/._Integer->1
Format[Wick[x_,y_]] := OverHat[x*y];
In[5]:= WickTheorem[a*b*c*d]
Out[5]=
a*b*c*d + c*d*a^b + b*d*a^c + b*c*a^d + a*d*b^c +
a^d*b^c + a*c*b^d + a^c*b^d + a*b*c^d + a^b*c^d
On an Athlon64 3000+ at 2130 MHz under Win2k with Mathematica 5.1 and
512MB RAM, I get the following timings:
In[6]:=
(Timing[Length[
WickTheorem[Times @@ ToExpression["a"<>ToString[#]]&/@ Range[#]]]]&)
/@ Range[10]
Out[6]=
{{0.*Second, 1}, {0.*Second, 2}, {0.*Second, 4}, {0.*Second, 10},
{0.*Second, 26}, {0.*Second, 76}, {0.016*Second, 232},
{0.125*Second, 764}, {0.937*Second, 2620}, {8.469*Second, 9496}}
I tried a rule that transforms products (a_Symbol b_Symbol
c_./;OrderedQ[a,b]->Wick[a,b] c), but it has not been as fast as this one.
If you are just interested in the number of the resulting terms,
Sum[(2k)!/(k! 2^k) * Binomial[n,2k],{k,0,n/2}] will give the answer
almost intantly (see
http://www.research.att.com/cgi-bin/access.cgi/as/njas/sequences/eisA.cgi?Anum=A000085).
Peter
Prev by Date:
**Re: Wick like theorem and "symbolic" compilation**
Next by Date:
**Re: Sundry Questions**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Wick like theorem and "symbolic" compilation**
Next by thread:
** Re: Wick like theorem and "symbolic" compilation**
| |