Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2005
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Language vs. Library

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg61194] Re: Language vs. Library
  • From: "Richard J. Fateman" <fateman at eecs.berkeley.edu>
  • Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 01:42:41 -0400 (EDT)
  • Organization: UC Berkeley
  • References: <did316$qfd$1@smc.vnet.net> <difqvj$fbm$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com


Steven T. Hatton wrote:


> 
> Mindyou, there is an important distinction between implementation and
> language which is not stressed in Mathematica

This is true

> since there is only one implementation.
> 

This is not true.

RJF


  • Prev by Date: fourier transform
  • Next by Date: Re: Argument checking while allowing specific assignments
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: Language vs. Library
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: Language vs. Library