Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2005
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: fourier transform

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg61237] Re: [mg61203] fourier transform
  • From: Pratik Desai <pdesai1 at umbc.edu>
  • Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 01:39:45 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <200510120543.BAA09326@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Masrur Hossain wrote:

>Hi folks
>           I have a list of pairs of numbers like
>
>  {{1.2, 3.4}, {2.2, 3.6}............}
>The first part is time and second part is amplitude.
>
>when I do the fourier transform by using
>Fourier[list]
>
>it gives me list of complex numbers but I expect real numbers
>(i.e . amplitude versus frequency)
>  
>
It should give you complex numbers, that is the whole idea of Fourier 
Transform (  I think  :-\ )
You can find the amplitude(frequency domain Frequency Response Function) 
simply by taking the absolute value and plotting it with respect to the 
number of points, and obviously the  phase is given  by taking Arg. I 
may be wrong about this but I don't think the way you have constructed 
your input list will work, the best way is to do is to construct your 
list with only amplitudes with a suitable time step. To gurantee good 
results the number of  points  should be something like  2^n ;-)       
.....256, 512, 1024 etc.

>
>Any help appreciated.
>
>thanks
>  
>
Hope this helps


Pratik  .

-- 
Pratik Desai
Graduate Student
UMBC
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Phone: 410 455 8134



  • Prev by Date: challenge problem
  • Next by Date: Re: Element test
  • Previous by thread: fourier transform
  • Next by thread: Re: fourier transform