|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Re: Language vs. Library why it matters
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg61245] Re: [mg61230] Re: Language vs. Library why it matters
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <andrzej at yhc.att.ne.jp>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 05:53:30 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200510130539.BAA04559@smc.vnet.net>
- Reply-to: Andrzej Kozlowski <andrzej at akikoz.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
On 13 Oct 2005, at 14:39, Richard J. Fateman wrote:
> contrary to some comments
> here, it IS NOT nice to have a language so complicated that you
> don't
> know what it will do, and use as an excuse that's ok because no one
> else knows either, and often it does the right thing.
Actually, a "language" need not be terribly complicated for that. It
only needs to contain the axioms of arithmetic...
Andrzej Kozlowski
Tokyo, Japan
Prev by Date:
Re: How to reverse sign on the y's in a list of (x, y)'s?
Next by Date:
Re: How to reverse sign on the y's in a list of (x, y)'s?
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Language vs. Library why it matters
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Re: Language vs. Library why it matters
|