Re: Function, Command, Operator, Object...etc.
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg61396] Re: Function, Command, Operator, Object...etc.
- From: "Jens-Peer Kuska" <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 02:44:37 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: Uni Leipzig
- References: <email@example.com>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
these things have all the same representation
in Mathematica, even some guys
think that a Object is different from a Function.
"Steven T. Hatton" <hattons at globalsymmetry.com>
schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:dislg0$mg4$1 at smc.vnet.net...
| Section 2.1.2 of The Mathematica Book for 5.2
discusses different ways to
| interpret parts of expressions. The examples
given are "Function, Command,
| Operator, Head and Object type." Do these terms
have any meaning within
| the Mathematica language, or are these purely
conceptual ideas intended to
| aid the user in understanding the language? Are
these terms given formal
| definitions as regards their meaning when used
to discuss Mathematica? If
| so, where might I find these definitions?
| "Philosophy is written in this grand book, The
Universe. ... But the book
| cannot be understood unless one first learns to
comprehend the language...
| in which it is written. It is written in the
language of mathematics, ...;
| without which wanders about in a dark
labyrinth." The Lion of Gaul
Prev by Date:
Re: Use strings in Mathematica, like in C?
Next by Date:
Re: interactive web Mathematica examples on Math World not working under firefox?
Previous by thread:
Fw: Function, Command, Operator, Object...etc.
Next by thread:
Re: surface fitting question