[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Function, Command, Operator, Object...etc.
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg61463] Re: Function, Command, Operator, Object...etc.
*From*: "Steven T. Hatton" <hattons at globalsymmetry.com>
*Date*: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 02:17:26 -0400 (EDT)
*References*: <200510160418.AAA22613@smc.vnet.net> <dj27iv$bnn$1@smc.vnet.net>
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Chris Chiasson wrote:
> Maybe I am wrong, but pretty much every expression has a head and zero
> or more slots. That's it.
I believe it would be more correct to say every expression has a head.
(anonymous functions?), and zero or more sub-expressions. I'm not sure if
slots have relevance beyond anonymous functions. That is, in f[a_,b_]:=a+b
a_ and b_ are patterns, not slots. Using the definition of f shown, we
could write f[#,#]& which says evaluate f[a_,b_] with both a and b replaced
with slot 1.
Evaluating this:
HoldPattern[f[a_,b_]:=a+b]//FullForm
gives:
HoldPattern[
SetDelayed[f[Pattern[a, Blank[]], Pattern[b, Blank[]]], Plus[a, b]]]
> I wonder if a pattern is an expression...
From the looks of the above, I would say yes. IIRC, the early editions
Mathematica Book asserted that everything was a "list", rather than
"expression". I might be wrong about that, but I am confident that
something gave me that idea years ago.
Here's a 5¢ tour of my current understanding of how Mathematica works:
What Mathematica does is to take whatever input it is given, read through it
evaluating each expression it encounters by looking for transformation
rules which result in a more specific form of the expression than the one
encountered. If such a rule is encountered, the original expression is
replaced with the more specific form, and the outer expression containing
the newly transformed expression is then evaluated in therms of the new
form. Ultimately, each "run" of the kernel represents a traversal of a
single composite expression. For example, if you tell it to evaluate an
entire notebook, it evaluates a notebook expression, and thus, all of the
sub-expressions in the notebook.
When I say "transformation rules" I am speaking in more general terms than
actual Rule[]s.
--
"Philosophy is written in this grand book, The Universe. ... But the book
cannot be understood unless one first learns to comprehend the language...
in which it is written. It is written in the language of mathematics, ...;
without which wanders about in a dark labyrinth." The Lion of Gaul
Prev by Date:
**Re: How smooth graphs?**
Next by Date:
**Re: vectorization**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Function, Command, Operator, Object...etc.**
Next by thread:
**Fw: Function, Command, Operator, Object...etc.**
| |