Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2005
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: incompatible standard packages

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg61587] Re: [mg61550] incompatible standard packages
  • From: "David Park" <djmp at earthlink.net>
  • Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 05:45:51 -0400 (EDT)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Just follow the French and use a different word for everything!

<< Graphics`MultipleListPlot`
<< DiscreteMath`Combinatorica`

?Star
Star[n] constructs a star on n vertices, which is a tree with one vertex of
\
degree n-1.

Context[Star]
DiscreteMath`Combinatorica`

To use a Star from MultipleListPlot define...

mlpStar = Graphics`MultipleListPlot`Star;

mlpStar
Information@@{%}
giving...
Graphics`MultipleListPlot`Star
Star is a kind of PlotSymbol for use with MultipleListPlot. It represents a
\
five-pointed star.

David Park
djmp at earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~djmp/


From: Marcus Stollsteimer [mailto:marcus314 at yahoo.com]
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net

Hi group,

the two standard packages Graphics`MultipleListPlot` and
DiscreteMath`Combinatorica` are not compatible to each other.

What can I do about it?

Regards,
Marcus


In[1]:=
<<Graphics`MultipleListPlot`

In[2]:=
<<DiscreteMath`Combinatorica`

From In[2]:=
Star::shdw: Symbol Star appears in multiple contexts
{DiscreteMath`Combinatorica`, Graphics`MultipleListPlot`};
definitions in context DiscreteMath`Combinatorica` may shadow or be
shadowed by other definitions.

--
Boy, those French: They have a different word for everything!
   -- Steve Martin



  • Prev by Date: Re: Eliminating parameters
  • Next by Date: Re: Baffling change to partial derivative in version 5.1
  • Previous by thread: Entry Point Not Found in DLL
  • Next by thread: Re: incompatible standard packages