Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2005
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: true limit of mathematica ? Help me !!!

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg60228] Re: [mg60203] true limit of mathematica ? Help me !!!
  • From: Chris Chiasson <chris.chiasson at gmail.com>
  • Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 04:53:04 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <200509070804.EAA17430@smc.vnet.net>
  • Reply-to: chris.chiasson at gmail.com
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Why have you used the complex number I as the first iterator?

On 9/7/05, LumisROB <lumisrob_NOGOOD_ at yahoo.com> wrote:
> During this calculation:
> 
> 
> m= Table[(i-j)+3.*j^-4 +50*I,{I,1,10000},{j,1,10000}];
> Det[m]
> 
> 
> the kernel has jammed and the following message has been visualized
> No more memory available.
> Mathematica kernel has shut down.
> 
> Is it possible to overcome this obstacle?
> 
> The dimension of the in demand memory is not limited from windows xp
> or my hardware-software' configuratiion, in fact such error also
> happens in xp 64 Bit with Mathematica 5.2 (64 Bit) Athlon 64 2 GB Ram.
> Are these problems the true limit of mathematica ? ??or Where am I
> being wrong?
> 
> Thanks for the help
> 
> Roberto R.
> 
> 


-- 
Chris Chiasson
http://chrischiasson.com/
1 (810) 265-3161


  • Prev by Date: Re: Strange "not a symbol or valid symbol name" error
  • Next by Date: Re: Three piece function
  • Previous by thread: true limit of mathematica ? Help me !!!
  • Next by thread: Re: true limit of mathematica ? Help me !!!