|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: basic issue with do and :=
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg60436] Re: basic issue with do and :=
- From: "Jens-Peer Kuska" <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 03:49:47 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: Uni Leipzig
- References: <dgbevg$fol$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Hi,
a = b
evaluates b with out delay,
a:=b
evaluates b every time when a "a" symbol appear in
your expression. In your second example you set
only
the definition that b[i] is equal to the symbolic
expression a[i]+1.
You may try
(a[#] = # ) & /@ Range[1, 10];
b[i_Integer] /; 1<=i<=10:=a[i]+1
Regards
Jens
"David" <isolanoster at gmail.com> schrieb im
Newsbeitrag news:dgbevg$fol$1 at smc.vnet.net...
| Hi all,
|
| this works as (I) expected
|
| -------------------------
| Do[a[i] = i, {i, 10}]
| Do[b[i] =a[i]+1, {i, 10}]
| -------------------------
|
| While this doesn't:
|
| --------------------------
| Do[a[i] = i, {i, 10}]
| Do[b[i] :=a[i]+1, {i, 10}]
| ---------------------------
|
| [note ":=" instead of "=" on the second line].
|
| namely the output is: "b[2]:=a[i]+1" for all i
|
|
|
| Is there any compact way to define: "b[i]
:=a[i]+1" for all i ?
|
|
| Thank you in advance,
|
| David
|
Prev by Date:
Re: Other Way than Print[] for Intermediate Results
Next by Date:
Re: basic issue with do and :=
Previous by thread:
Re: basic issue with do and :=
Next by thread:
Re: basic issue with do and :=
|