Re: bug in Partition?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg65693] Re: [mg65679] bug in Partition?
- From: "Carl K. Woll" <carlw at wolfram.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 01:44:49 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200604140832.EAA22075@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Chris Chiasson wrote: > Partition[Range[11], 3, 3, {1, 1}, Hold[]] > > the output is > > {{1, 2, 3}, {4, 5, 6}, {7, 8, 9}, {10, 11}} > > I would expect > > {{1, 2, 3}, {4, 5, 6}, {7, 8, 9}, {10, 11, Hold[]}} > > Might this be because of a ReleaseHold somewhere in the implementation > of Partition? > > (Ver 5.2, Windows) Actually, the fifth argument should be a symbol or a list of stuff. Basically, the symbol case is converted to list form: Partition[_,_,_,_,symbol] is converted to Partition[_,_,_,_,{symbol}] It turns out that some additional generality was incorporated so that the head of the 5th argument doesn't need to be List. So, your sample input Partition[Range[11], 3, 3, {1, 1}, Hold[]] was actually interpreted as Partition[Range[11], 3, 3, {1, 1}, {} and no padding was done. To get your desired input, use Partition[Range[11], 3, 3, {1, 1}, {Hold[]}] Note that because the head is immaterial, the following input will generate the same output: Partition[Range[11], 3, 3, {1, 1}, foo[Hold[]]] Carl Woll Wolfram Research
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: bug in Partition?
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl>
- Re: Re: bug in Partition?
- References:
- bug in Partition?
- From: "Chris Chiasson" <chris.chiasson@gmail.com>
- bug in Partition?