[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Union, Sort at different levels of a list
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg65711] Re: Union, Sort at different levels of a list
*From*: Jean-Marc Gulliet <jeanmarc.gulliet at gmail.com>
*Date*: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 01:45:17 -0400 (EDT)
*Organization*: The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
*References*: <e1nn4v$lm8$1@smc.vnet.net>
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
leigh pascoe wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I am having a problem with the syntax for Sorting at different levels of
> a list structure. My problem arises in genetics, where an individual
> locus is characterised by two alleles, say (i,j).
> If I consider a general mating with parents (i,j) and (k,l) they will
> have possible offspring (i,k),(i,l),(j,k),and (j,l). I want to generate
> all the possibilities for a general mating with the offspring and tried
> the following.
>
> combos[i_,j_]:=Flatten[Outer[List,i,j],1]
> matings[n_]:=
> Flatten[Table[{{i,j,x,k,l},combos[{i,j},{k,l}]},{i,1,n},{j,1,n},{k,1,n},{l,1,n}],n]
> In[104]:=Sort[matings[2]]
> Out[104]=
> {{{{1,1,x,1,1},{{1,1},{1,1},{1,1},{1,1}}},
> {{1,1,x,1, 2},{{1,1},{1,2},{1,1},{1,2}}}},
> {{{1,1,x,2,1},{{1,2},{1,1},{1,2},{1,1}}},
> {{1,1,x,2,2},{{1,2},{1,2},{1,2},{1,2}}}},
> {{{1,2,x,1,1},{{1,1},{1,1},{2,1},{2,1}}},
> {{1,2,x,1,2},{{1,1},{1,2},{2,1},{2,2}}}},
> {{{1,2,x,2,1},{{1,2},{1,1},{2,2},{2,1}}},
> {{1,2,x,2,2},{{1,2},{1,2},{2,2},{2,2}}}},
> {{{2,1,x,1,1},{{2,1},{2,1},{1,1},{1,1}}},
> {{2,1,x,1,2},{{2,1},{2,2},{1,1},{1,2}}}},
> {{{2,1,x,2,1},{{2,2},{2,1},{1,2},{1,1}}},
> {{2,1,x,2,2},{{2,2},{2,2},{1,2},{1,2}}}},
> {{{2,2,x,1,1},{{2,1},{2,1},{2,1},{2,1}}},
> {{2,2,x,1,2},{{2,1},{2,2},{2,1},{2,2}}}},
> {{{2,2,x,2,1},{{2,2},{2,1},{2,2},{2,1}}},
> {{2,2,x,2,2},{{2,2},{2,2},{2,2},{2,2}}}}}
>
> This gives me the full list of possible parents and offspring (the x's
> are for visual clarity only). However I would like to simplify it. In
> general it is assumed that (i,j) is the same as (j,i), i.e. these are
> sets of alleles. It is also usually assumed that the parental
> combination (i,j),(j,k) is the same as (j,k),(i,j). The obvious function
> to use is Union after Sorting to reduce the number of classes, but I am
> having trouble getting the syntax correct for applying the functions at
> the appropriate level.
>
> I tried another approach as follows
>
> parents[n_]:=
> Flatten[Table[{Sort[{i,j}],Sort[{k,l}]},{i,1,n},{j,1,n},{k,1,n},{l,1,n}],3]
> parents[2]
> Out[101]=
> {{{1,1},{1,1}},{{1,1},{1,2}},{{1,1},{1,2}},{{1,1},{2,2}},{{1,2},{1,1}},{{1,
> 2},{1,2}},{{1,2},{1,2}},{{1,2},{2,2}},{{1,2},{1,1}},{{1,2},{1,2}},{{1,
> 2},{1,2}},{{1,2},{2,2}},{{2,2},{1,1}},{{2,2},{1,2}},{{2,2},{1,2}},{{2,
> 2},{2,2}}}
> It gives the parental combinations as a nested list with the individual
> genotypes (doublets) sorted. Then
>
> In[105]:=offspring[{i_,j_},{k_,l_}]:={{i,k},{i,l},{j,k},{j,l}}
> offspring[{1,2},{3,4}]
> Out[106]={{1,3},{1,4},{2,3},{2,4}}
>
> works for a given set of parents, but how can I thread it over the list
> of all parents pairs? And then apply Union to produce, for example in
> the two allele case, the parents with their offspring as
>
> {{{1,1},{1,1}}, >{{1,1}}
> {{1,1},{1,2}}, > {{1,1},{1,2}}
> {{1,2},{1,2}}, > {{1,1},{1,2},{2,2}
> {{1,2},{2,2}}, > {{1,2},{2,2}}
> {{2,2},{2,2}}} > {{2,2}}
>
> (I typed this in, the format is unimportant). This is the form that one
> normally sees the data in. Eventually I am aiming at writing a
> likelihood equation, but I am having trouble just listing all the
> possibilities. Any help much appreciated.
>
> LP
>
>
>
Hi Leigh,
The following expression should do what you are looking for. Note that I
have changed 'n' by 3 in the last line of the function matings.
In[1]:=
combos[i_, j_] := Flatten[Outer[List, i, j], 1]
matings[n_] := Flatten[Table[{{{i, j}, {k, l}},
combos[{i, j}, {k, l}]}, {i, 1, n}, {j, 1, n},
{k, 1, n}, {l, 1, n}], 3]
In[3]:=
Union[({Sort[Sort /@ #1[[1]]],
Union[Sort /@ #1[[2]]]} & ) /@ matings[2],
SameTest -> (#1[[1]] == #2[[1]] & )]
Out[3]=
{{{{1, 1}, {1, 1}}, {{1, 1}}}, {{{1, 1}, {1, 2}},
{{1, 1}, {1, 2}}}, {{{1, 1}, {2, 2}}, {{1, 2}}},
{{{1, 2}, {1, 2}}, {{1, 1}, {1, 2}, {2, 2}}},
{{{1, 2}, {2, 2}}, {{1, 2}, {2, 2}}},
{{{2, 2}, {2, 2}}, {{2, 2}}}}
Best regards,
Jean-Marc
Prev by Date:
**Re: Union, Sort at different levels of a list**
Next by Date:
**Re: 3D ContourGraphics alternative**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Union, Sort at different levels of a list**
Next by thread:
**Re: Re: Union, Sort at different levels of a list**
| |