Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2006
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Troubles in NonlinearFit-Why always failed?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg65982] Re: Troubles in NonlinearFit-Why always failed?
  • From: "simon yang" <yanshanguke at 163.com>
  • Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 05:19:19 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <e2fkib$blb$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

I have found the solutions.
The key lies here, the functions Gc[x] and L[x] used in Epsilon2[x]
was not be replaced by their definement.
If I replace the  Gc[x] and L[x] in Epsilon2[x] directly by their
definement, then NolinearRegress work.

So how to make sure functions were replaced by their definement when I
use them in other functions?

The NonlinearRegress use too much time though I had set the
MaxIterations to 10, about 1 hour, in mathematica!
But in other software developed by C language , 10 minutes just be used
though the function have hundreds of parameters.
How to make NonlinearFit in mathematica more quick?


  • Prev by Date: Re: matrix operations -- shared data vs copied
  • Next by Date: Re: Symbolic vectors possible?
  • Previous by thread: Troubles in NonlinearFit-Why always failed?
  • Next by thread: Re: Generating a function from a series