[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Noob question about definite integration
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg72220] Re: Noob question about definite integration
*From*: "dimitris" <dimmechan at yahoo.com>
*Date*: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:05:49 -0500 (EST)
*References*: <eloret$o8e$1@smc.vnet.net>
Mathematica is right!
f[r_] := (h^2 - r^2)^3
symb = Integrate[(4/3)*Pi*((h^2 - r^2)^3)^3, {r, 0, h}]
(262144*h^19*Pi)/692835
In order to justify Mathematica's analytic result compare the following
tables
TableForm[(N[#1, 20] & )[(symb /. h -> #1 & ) /@ Range[10]]]
TableForm[(NIntegrate[(4/3)*Pi*((#1^2 - r^2)^3)^3, {r, 0, #1},
WorkingPrecision -> 40, PrecisionGoal -> 20] & ) /@ Range[10]]
Regards
Dimitris
Ï/Ç some guy named Dave Ýãñáøå:
> Hey all,
>
> I have a function that I want to integrate. It's basically a smoothing
> function over a vector space, and I want to normalize it. The function itself
> looks like this:
>
> f(r) = (h^2 - r^2)^3
>
> where r is the scalar length ||x|| of some displacement vector x, and h is a
> constant. We are really only interested in values of r in [0,h], and for 2D
> vectors. However, I have some research literature involving 3D vectors that I
> want to compare against, just for sanity.
>
> So, if x is a 3D vector, then the surface of the sphere at radius r should be
> (4/3)(f(r))^3. We should then be able to get the definite integral from
> Mathematica by doing something like:
>
> Integrate[ 4/3 * Pi( (h^2 - r^2)^3 )^3, {r, 0, h}]
>
> When I do so, I get back
>
> 262144 pi h^19 \ 692835
>
> However, the literature I have says that the integral should yield
>
> 64 pi h^9 / 315
>
> So, have I screwed something up? Is the literature wrong, perhaps?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Dave
Prev by Date:
**Re: How to find Minimal Poly of a possible algebraic number?**
Next by Date:
**Re: Combining ListPlot3D with Show[]**
Previous by thread:
**RE: Please help overcome problems with integration**
Next by thread:
**Notebook Typesetting for Printing**
| |