[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: Re: GraphPlot display anomaly

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg72449] Re: [mg72417] Re: GraphPlot display anomaly
• From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>
• Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 05:19:56 -0500 (EST)
• References: <200612231114.GAA20908@smc.vnet.net><emlenp$9rn$1@smc.vnet.net> <200612271027.FAA20299@smc.vnet.net>

You were right about the double picture; there seems to be indeed an  
error in the package. (I failed to see this because once I saw the  
syntax of your program was wrong I did not pay any attention to its  
semantics).

Anyway, the problem can be overcome with a simple application of Block:

In[1]:=
Needs["DiscreteMath`GraphPlot`"];

In[2]:=
Show[Block[{$DisplayFunction=Identity},GraphPlot[{1 -> 2},
     ImageSize -> {50, 50}]]]

works fine, at least on my system.

Andrzej Kozlowski



On 27 Dec 2006, at 19:27, zac wrote:

> Well, not quite self-evident, since your answer only explains the
> question concerning the necessity of Evaluate. I do accept that I've
> left out the parenthesis, but this does not explain why there are two
> outputs in the notebook. Actually, as Chris wrote, it must be  
> something
> with a Block in the package. Does anyone know a method to overcome  
> this
> Block-problem?
>
> istvan
>
>
> Andrzej Kozlowski wrote:
>>
>> The only problem is with your code. The correct way to do this is:
>>
>>
>> Needs["DiscreteMath`GraphPlot`"];
>>
>>
>> GraphPlot[{1 -> 2},
>>      ImageSize -> {50, 50},
>>      DisplayFunction -> (Display[$Display, #] &)
>>      ];
>>
>> Note the crucial parentheses missing from original code.
>> I think the answers to all your questions should now be self-evident.
>>
>> Andrzej Kozlowski
>> Tokyo, Japan
>

• References:
  • GraphPlot display anomaly
    • From: "zac" <replicatorzed@gmail.com>
  • Re: GraphPlot display anomaly
    • From: "zac" <replicatorzed@gmail.com>