Re: Re: Mathematica Programmer vs. Programming in Mathematica/ functions and OOP
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg63460] Re: [mg63439] Re: Mathematica Programmer vs. Programming in Mathematica/ functions and OOP
- From: "Richard Fateman" <fateman at cs.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 01:16:13 -0500 (EST)
- References: <dnop91$2fd$1@smc.vnet.net> <dnrce6$kh1$1@smc.vnet.net> <200512311140.GAA28054@smc.vnet.net> <665A7FE6-C576-4B6F-BB77-5554FD49DE05@mimuw.edu.pl>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Yes, chapter 17. I certainly do not recall reading all of the manuscript before it was published. Maybe I consented to do so. RJF ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrzej Kozlowski" <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl> To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net Subject: [mg63460] Re: [mg63439] Re: Mathematica Programmer vs. Programming in Mathematica/ functions and OOP > *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* > > On 31 Dec 2005, at 20:40, Richard Fateman wrote: > >> A nice explanation of how functional programming and OO are >> very nearly the same thing is in an appendix to P. Graham's ANSI Common >> Lisp >> book. > > I don't think there is any such explanation in any of the appendices - at > least not in the 1996 edition I have. Perhaps you meant Chapter 17 > "Example : Objects" ? > > Hmm... You are mentioned as one of the people who "consented to read all > or part of the manuscript" - which was it ? :-) > > Andrzej Kozlowski > >