MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Assuming to be a real number is useless even in simple cases?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg63959] Re: [mg63945] Assuming to be a real number is useless even in simple cases?
  • From: <bsyehuda at gmail.com>
  • Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:45:44 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <200601240630.BAA23642@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Hi,
It seems that Im[] is not using this specific assumption for simplification.
However you can use
Refine[Im[x], Assumptions -> x \[Element] Reals]
or
Simplify[Im[x], Assumptions -> x \[Element] Reals]
to achieve this
yehuda

On 1/24/06, Roberto <roberto at pop.it> wrote:
>
> In[1]:=
> Assuming[x\[Element]Reals, Im[x]]
>
> Out[1]=
> Im[x]
>
> Why it's not zero?
>
>


  • Prev by Date: SetPrecision causes logical comparisons to fail in Mathematica 5.1 on Mac OS X?
  • Next by Date: Re: Assuming to be a real number is useless even in simple cases?
  • Previous by thread: Assuming to be a real number is useless even in simple cases?
  • Next by thread: Re: Assuming to be a real number is useless even in simple cases?