|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: puzzling revolution surface
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg67359] Re: puzzling revolution surface
- From: dh <dh at metrohm.ch>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 02:14:32 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <e757vn$l2t$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Hi Narasimham,
if you plot a surface of revolution, the curve in the x-z plane is
independent of the rotation angle. However, your curve does depend on
this angle and therefore, your surface is no more a surface of
revolution. That this works at all is an undocumented feature of
SurfaceOfRevolution.
Daniel
Narasimham wrote:
> Am not able to comprehend how this is a surface of revolution.(When 2D
> plots on two parameters are also possible).
>
> << Graphics`SurfaceOfRevolution`
> <<RealTime3D`
> SurfaceOfRevolution[{Sin[u] ,0.8 Cos[ v] +1 },{u,0, Pi},{v,0,2
> Pi},RevolutionAxis->{0,0,1}]
>
Prev by Date:
Sturm-Liouville (eigenvalue/eigenfunction) problems
Next by Date:
Re: Help: ratio of integral of f(x)^2 to square of integral of f(x)
Previous by thread:
puzzling revolution surface
Next by thread:
Re: puzzling revolution surface
|