Re: NDolve + ParametricPlot
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg67538] Re: [mg67513] NDolve + ParametricPlot
- From: Selwyn Hollis <sh2.7183 at earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 04:14:13 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200606290409.AAA29004@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Paolo,
Look at the value of sol, and you will notice that NDSolve gives its
result wrapped in an extra pair of braces. ParametricPlot doesn't
like that. A simple fix is to put First@ in front of NDSolve, i.e.,
sol = First@NDSolve[{x''[t] == x[t], x[0] == 1, x'[0] == 1.1}, x, {t,
0,3}];
--- Selwyn Hollis
On Jun 29, 2006, at 12:09 AM, Paolo Pani wrote:
> Hi, i'm new with Mathematica..i'm getting mad with expressions like
> this:
>
> sol = NDSolve[{x''[t] == x[t], x[0] == 1, x'[0] == 1.1}, x, {t, 0,
> 3}];
> Plot[x[t] /. sol, {t, 0, 3}];
> Plot[D[x[t]] /. sol, {t, 0, 3}];
> ParametricPlot[Evaluate[{x[t] /. sol, D[x[t] /. sol]}], {t, 0, 3}];
>
> The first two Plots are ok, the third give me:
>
>
>
> ParametricPlot::pptr: {InterpolatingFunction[{{0., 3.}}, {2, 2, True,
> Real, \
> {3}, {0}}, {{\[LeftSkeleton]1\[RightSkeleton]}}, {{0, 3, 6, 9, 12,
> 15, 18, \
> 21, 24, 27, \[LeftSkeleton]32\[RightSkeleton]}, {1., 1.1, \
> [LeftSkeleton]8\
> \[RightSkeleton], \[LeftSkeleton]113\[RightSkeleton]}}, {Automatic}]
> [t]}
> does \
> not evaluate to a pair of real numbers at t = 1.25`*^-7.
>
>
>
>
> ... and "More..." does tell nothing more.
>
> Where is my mistake?
>
> Thanks and sorry for my bad english
>
> Paolo
>
- References:
- NDolve + ParametricPlot
- From: Paolo Pani <paolopani@RIMUOVEREgmail.com>
- NDolve + ParametricPlot