MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: General--Making the DisplayFormula style in ArticleModern look like Traditional


What is TraditionalForm? Is it what you find in math books and research
articles? In fact, these are full of inexact, confusing and varied notation.
'Traditional form' is not at all the golden standard that is being claimed!

Mathematica StandardForm is an important step to simple, clear and
unambiguous notation - even if it doesn't look like what people are used to.

David Park
djmp at earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~djmp/



From: Bill Rowe [mailto:readnewsciv at earthlink.net]
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net

The choice of TraditionalForm versus StandardForm in the journal really
depends on the goals of the article. If the goal is to make the mathematics
as clear as possible to the widest possible audience, then TraditionalForm
is clearly the better choice. But if the goal is to elucidate how a
particular task can be done in Mathematica, StandardForm is the better
choice as it more clearly shows the underlying Mathematica code.



  • Prev by Date: Re: Outputs of the Limit function
  • Next by Date: Importing Several sheets from one Excel file into Mathematica
  • Previous by thread: Re: General--Making the DisplayFormula style in ArticleModern look like Traditional
  • Next by thread: Re: General--Making the DisplayFormula style in ArticleModern look like Traditional