Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2006
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: Simplification and Arg[]

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg66612] Re: [mg66603] Re: [mg66593] Simplification and Arg[]
  • From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>
  • Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 03:01:47 -0400 (EDT)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

On 23 May 2006, at 07:14, David Park wrote:

> Andrew,
>
> For doing complex algebra the BIG, BIG command is ComplexExpand.  
> One can
> hardly get along without it. But for some reason, users starting  
> out with
> complex algebra on Mathematica frequently overlook it. (Maybe they  
> should
> have called it ComplexSimplify?)


I don't think so: it quite properly called ComplexExpand because it  
"expands". In fact, for purely real expressions it will usually  
return the same output as Expand:



ComplexExpand[(a + b)*(c + d)]


a*c + b*c + a*d + b*d


On the other hand if a and b are complex, the expression returned by  
ComplexExpand will certainly in general not be simpler than the  
original one:



ComplexExpand[(a + b)*(c + d), {a, b, c, d}]


(-Im[a])*Im[c] - Im[b]*Im[c] - Im[a]*Im[d] - Im[b]*Im[d] + Re[a]*Re 
[c] + Re[b]*Re[c] + Re[a]*Re[d] + Re[b]*Re[d] +
   I*(Im[c]*Re[a] + Im[d]*Re[a] + Im[c]*Re[b] + Im[d]*Re[b] + Im[a]*Re 
[c] + Im[b]*Re[c] + Im[a]*Re[d] + Im[b]*Re[d])


I do not think I would call this "simplifying",  would you? ;-)

Andrzej Kozlowski
Tokyo, Japan




  • Prev by Date: Re: Graphics--triangle intersection
  • Next by Date: Re: How to write formatted number into a file
  • Previous by thread: Re: Simplification and Arg[]
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: Simplification and Arg[]