Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2006
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg70996] Re: Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional
  • From: "marika" <marika5000 at gmail.com>
  • Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 04:08:06 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <200610200921.FAA11092@smc.vnet.net> <200610210914.FAA29189@smc.vnet.net> <ehf1f6$5bs$1@smc.vnet.net>

Murray Eisenberg wrote:
> @ is an abbreviation for Composition:
>
>    Composition[f, g][expr]
> f[g[expr]]
>
>    f@g[expr]
> f[g[expr]]
>
> But this one is a bit difficult to discover from the documentation.

I am loving it!

mk5000

"Dad had a close call last spring
It's a miracle he's still here
But I know I'm a lucky man
God's given me a pretty fair hand"--Montgomery Gentry, Lucky Man


  • Prev by Date: Re: Plotting iso-distance curves from matrices
  • Next by Date: Trigonometric solve
  • Previous by thread: RE: Tricky visualization of maximization problem
  • Next by thread: Re: Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional