|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg70996] Re: Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional
- From: "marika" <marika5000 at gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 04:08:06 -0500 (EST)
- References: <200610200921.FAA11092@smc.vnet.net> <200610210914.FAA29189@smc.vnet.net> <ehf1f6$5bs$1@smc.vnet.net>
Murray Eisenberg wrote:
> @ is an abbreviation for Composition:
>
> Composition[f, g][expr]
> f[g[expr]]
>
> f@g[expr]
> f[g[expr]]
>
> But this one is a bit difficult to discover from the documentation.
I am loving it!
mk5000
"Dad had a close call last spring
It's a miracle he's still here
But I know I'm a lucky man
God's given me a pretty fair hand"--Montgomery Gentry, Lucky Man
Prev by Date:
Re: Plotting iso-distance curves from matrices
Next by Date:
Trigonometric solve
Previous by thread:
RE: Tricky visualization of maximization problem
Next by thread:
Re: Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional
|