[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Help finding x of hypergeometric 2F1[a,b,c,x] ?
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg71834] Help finding x of hypergeometric 2F1[a,b,c,x] ?
*From*: titus_piezas at yahoo.com
*Date*: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:05:41 -0500 (EST)
Hello all,
The above function is given by Mathematica as
Hypergeometric2F1[a,b,c,d]. Define the ff,
h1 = 2F1[a,b,1,1-x]
h2 = 2F1[a,b,1,x]
Problem: Given a,b where 0<(a,b)<1, and a+b=1, find the unique real
number x with 0<x<1 such that,
h1/h2 = sqrt[n]
for arbitrary rational n>0.
For certain (a,b) namely, (1/2, 1/2), (1/3, 2/3), (1/4, 3/4) and (1/6,
5/6), closed-form solutions are known for x. For example, the first
reduces to finding the "elliptic modulus k" and x can easily be given
as x = ModularLambda[Sqrt[-n]]. Surprisingly though, it seems little
is known for other (a,b).
Question: Is there Mathematica code to numerically evaluate x to
arbitrary precision for any (a,b) and n? The fact that x is 0<x<1
greatly helps. To illustrate, say for (1/5, 4/5) and given a certain n,
one can find x up to a few digits precision by plugging in values x =
0.1, 0.2,...0.9 and observing how close (h1/h2)^2 comes to n, and, say,
if it is between 0.4-0.5, then the values 0.41, 0.41,...0.50, and so
on, with x becoming increasingly precise as the "range" where x lies
becomes narrower. I did this manually (I know, crude) but there must be
code for this.
Any help will be appreciated.
-Titus
Prev by Date:
**Re: How can one produce the unevaluated effect that Mathematica uses on SetOptions and certain Integrate commands?**
Next by Date:
**Re: Strange empty set of solutions**
Previous by thread:
**Solving General Linear Equations**
Next by thread:
**please explain why ToExpression[SubscriptBox["x","1"],StandardForm] ...**
| |