Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2006
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: general

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg70062] Re: general
  • From: Jean-Marc Gulliet <jeanmarc.gulliet at gmail.com>
  • Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 04:10:49 -0400 (EDT)
  • Organization: The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
  • References: <eflelc$dhu$1@smc.vnet.net>

dimmechan at yahoo.com wrote:
> In the following link
> 
> http://support.wolfram.com/mathematica/kernel/Symbols/
> 
> there is information for Built-in functions as well functions from
> Standard Add-on Packages.
> 
> Although. as it is mentioned, the page was last updated on April 4,
> 1998, it contains notes for some Symbols and Functions you cannot
> find everywhere.
> 
> For example for ArgumentCountQ, Oscillatory, GaussKonrod and Flat

Oscillatory and GaussKonrod are mentioned in the documentation for 
NIntegrate.
	
Mathematica 5.2 Documentation / Built-in Functions / Numerical 
Computation / Integration / NIntegrate:

"Possible settings for Method are GaussKronrod, DoubleExponential, 
Trapezoidal, Oscillatory, MultiDimensional, MonteCarlo, and 
QuasiMonteCarlo. GaussKronrod and MultiDimensional are adaptive methods. 
MonteCarlo and QuasiMonteCarlo are randomized methods, appropriate for 
high-dimensional integrals."

http://documents.wolfram.com/mathematica/functions/NIntegrate


Mathematica 5.2 Documentation / Built-in Functions / Programming / 
Pattern Matching / Flat:

"Flat corresponds to the mathematical property of associativity"
http://documents.wolfram.com/mathematica/functions/Flat

Regards,
Jean-Marc


  • Prev by Date: Re: tableform question
  • Next by Date: Re: Defining Solve results as variable
  • Previous by thread: Re: subsets of a set
  • Next by thread: Re: four argument form of infix