|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: On order of options to Graphics
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg70372] Re: On order of options to Graphics
- From: Bill Rowe <readnewsciv at sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 03:07:56 -0400 (EDT)
On 10/13/06 at 1:30 AM, nma at 12000.org (Nasser Abbasi) wrote:
>"Bill Rowe" <readnewsciv at sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>news:egi1os$j9l$1 at smc.vnet.net...
>>>It seems more logical to me to write {Primitive,Directive}.
>>This seems totally illogical to me. This is asking Mathematica to
>>draw a primitive before the directives on how to draw that
>>primitive are given. Why would you expect this to work? Clearly,
>>all Mathematica can do is draw the primitive with default
>>directives.
>I am looking at this from the point of view that it is more normal
>to say :
>"Draw a line with thickness 2 and color red".
>Rather than say :
>"Draw with thickness 2 and color red a line"
>Which is what Mathematica wants. That is why I said the order is not
>logical to me.
Aah... Now I understand. Not as illogical as I suggested. Think
of giving Mathematica direction as
"With thickness 2 and color red, draw a line from ... "
Or in other words, the sequence is to pick up a red pen with the
proper thickness then start drawing.
--
To reply via email subtract one hundred and four
Prev by Date:
Re: How to extract numbers from list elements with text?
Next by Date:
FindRoot
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Re: On order of options to Graphics
Next by thread:
Is it possible to "pre-evaluate" parts of pure function?
|