Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
MathGroup Archive
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: On order of options to Graphics

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg70372] Re: On order of options to Graphics
  • From: Bill Rowe <readnewsciv at>
  • Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 03:07:56 -0400 (EDT)

On 10/13/06 at 1:30 AM, nma at (Nasser Abbasi) wrote:

>"Bill Rowe" <readnewsciv at> wrote in message
>news:egi1os$j9l$1 at

>>>It seems more logical to me to write {Primitive,Directive}.

>>This seems totally illogical to me. This is asking Mathematica to
>>draw a primitive before the directives on how to draw that
>>primitive are given. Why would you expect this to work? Clearly,
>>all Mathematica can do is draw the primitive with default

>I am looking at this from the point of view that it is more normal
>to say :

>"Draw a line with thickness 2 and color red".

>Rather than say :

>"Draw with thickness 2 and color red a line"

>Which is what Mathematica wants. That is why I said the order is not
>logical to me.

Aah... Now I understand. Not as illogical as I suggested. Think 
of giving Mathematica direction as

"With thickness 2 and color red, draw a line from ... "

Or in other words, the sequence is to pick up a red pen with the 
proper thickness then start drawing.
To reply via email subtract one hundred and four

  • Prev by Date: Re: How to extract numbers from list elements with text?
  • Next by Date: FindRoot
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: Re: On order of options to Graphics
  • Next by thread: Is it possible to "pre-evaluate" parts of pure function?