|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
RE: Re: Re: Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg70674] RE: [mg70670] Re: [mg70633] Re: [mg70587] Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional
- From: "David Park" <djmp at earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 02:49:40 -0400 (EDT)
Chris,
Operate applies the function to only the Head of the expression.
f@g[x]
f[g[x]]
Operate[f, g[x]]
f[g][x]
Although I think it would have made more sense to define Operate with
subvalues so one could write
Operate[f][g[x]] or Operate[f]@g[x]
David Park
djmp at earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~djmp/
From: Chris Chiasson [mailto:chris at chiasson.name]
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
Andrzej Kozlowski,
Thanks for the wildcard info!
So, does @ correspond to Operate? I think Operate is a bit different
than @, but I am not sure.
Prev by Date:
Symbolic Derivatives of Unspecified Functions
Next by Date:
How to specify the starting parameter search point when using NonlinearRegress
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional
Next by thread:
Re: Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional
|