Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2006
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Using "=" vs ":="

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg70678] Re: Using "=" vs ":="
  • From: "Graham Michalk" <gmichalk at optushome.com.au>
  • Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 02:49:47 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <ehf1ks$5ds$1@smc.vnet.net>

The arguments of all Functions in Mathematica must be enclosed by [ ... ] 
not ( ... )

You should therefore have:

In[1]:= f[x_, y_]:=1-Sin[x^2+y^2]

Else what Mathematica does is to treat Sin(x^2+y^2) as the variable

Sin multiplied by the Expression (x^2+y^2), the latter evaluating to 5 for 
x=1 and y=2

Sin 5 is equivalent to 5 Sin

Graham M

"misha" <iamisha1 at comcast.net> wrote in message 
news:ehf1ks$5ds$1 at smc.vnet.net...
> I'm going through Mathematic by Example, 2nd ed., (Abell and Braselton),
> and have come across something that puzzles me.
>
> Chapter 2, Section 2, Example 8
> Define f(x,y)=1-sin(x^2+y^2)
>
> So I first try,
> In[1]:= f[x_, y_]:=1-Sin(x^2+y^2)
> No problem so far...
> Then,
> In[2]:= f[x,y]
> Out[2]:=1-Sin(x^2+y^2)
> Still no problem...
> Then,
> In[3]:=f[1,2]
> Out[3]:=1-5 Sin
>
> Huh?
>
> I noticed that rather than using ":=" to "simply define" this function,
> as opposed to (just) "=" to "define and compute" this function, I get
> different subsequent behavior.  Specifically, doing the above with just
> "=", works fine.
> In[1]:= f[x_, y_]=1-Sin(x^2+y^2)
> ....
> In[3]:=f[1,2]
> Out[3]:=1-Sin[5]
>
> My question is, Why?  What's the difference between ":=" and "=" for
> defining functions?
>
> Thanks!
> Misha
> 



  • Prev by Date: RE: Using "=" vs ":="
  • Next by Date: Re: Using "=" vs ":=" [Thanks!]
  • Previous by thread: RE: Using "=" vs ":="
  • Next by thread: Re: Using "=" vs ":="