MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Using "=" vs ":="

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg70692] Re: Using "=" vs ":="
  • From: Dave Seaman <dseaman at no.such.host>
  • Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 02:50:50 -0400 (EDT)
  • Organization: Information Technology at Purdue
  • References: <ehf1ks$5ds$1@smc.vnet.net>

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 06:04:12 +0000 (UTC), misha wrote:
> I'm going through Mathematic by Example, 2nd ed., (Abell and Braselton), 
> and have come across something that puzzles me.

> Chapter 2, Section 2, Example 8
> Define f(x,y)=1-sin(x^2+y^2)

> So I first try,
> In[1]:= f[x_, y_]:=1-Sin(x^2+y^2)
> No problem so far...

Actually, there's a problem.  Function evaluation is represented by
square brackets in Mathematica, not by parentheses.  What you wrote
involves multiplication of a simple variable called Sin by the expression
(x^2+y^2).

> Then,
> In[2]:= f[x,y]
> Out[2]:=1-Sin(x^2+y^2)
> Still no problem...
> Then,
> In[3]:=f[1,2]
> Out[3]:=1-5 Sin

> Huh?

It's exactly what you told it, since (x^2+y^2) evaluates to 5 here.

> I noticed that rather than using ":=" to "simply define" this function, 
> as opposed to (just) "=" to "define and compute" this function, I get 
> different subsequent behavior.  Specifically, doing the above with just 
> "=", works fine.
> In[1]:= f[x_, y_]=1-Sin(x^2+y^2)
> ....
> In[3]:=f[1,2]
> Out[3]:=1-Sin[5]

> My question is, Why?  What's the difference between ":=" and "=" for 
> defining functions?

There is a difference, but I don't think it's relevant to your question.
Try it with square brackets and then with parentheses, and compare
results.



-- 
Dave Seaman
U.S. Court of Appeals to review three issues 
concerning case of Mumia Abu-Jamal.
<http://www.mumia2000.org/>


  • Prev by Date: Re: Built-in symbols arguments
  • Next by Date: Re: Using "=" vs ":="
  • Previous by thread: Re: Using "=" vs ":="
  • Next by thread: Re: Using "=" vs ":="