[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: partials of Sum[x[i]^2, {i,1,n}] (e.g.)
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg69544] Re: partials of Sum[x[i]^2, {i,1,n}] (e.g.)
*From*: dh <dh at metrohm.ch>
*Date*: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 06:45:09 -0400 (EDT)
*References*: <eebfke$4d8$1@smc.vnet.net>
Ji,
for this kind of things, Mathematica has the pattern:
__ meaning at least one, or
___ meaning zero or one.
Daniel
kj wrote:
> In symbolic manipulations, one often needs to leave some of the
> limits of an expression in symbolic form. E.g. the n in:
>
> f[x[1],...,x[n]] = Sum[x[i]^2, {i, 1, n}],
>
> (where I've used Mathematica notation loosely).
>
> Then one often finds derivations like
>
> D[f[x[1],...,x[n]], x[k]] = 2 x[k], for all k in { 1,..., n }
>
> Is it possible to do something like this in Mathematica?
>
> More generally, can Mathematica fully understand expressions with
> symbolic limits?
>
> Basically, I have a slightly hairier expression that I want to take
> the partials of, set them all equal to zero to produce a system of
> n equations. If that weren't enough, I'd like to solve this system
> of n equations using Mathematica. This kind of manipulation is
> far more difficult, as far as symbolic math goes, than anything
> I've seen Mathematica do yet, because it requires Mathematica to
> understand the notion of an array with a "symbolic cardinality",
> but I thought I'd ask.
>
> Thanks!
>
> kj
Prev by Date:
**Re: How to animate a list plot?**
Next by Date:
**Re: Q: How to animate a list plot?**
Previous by thread:
**partials of Sum[x[i]^2, {i,1,n}] (e.g.)**
Next by thread:
**RE: partials of Sum[x[i]^2, {i,1,n}] (e.g.)**
| |