Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2006
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Plotting with arbitary precision????

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg69622] Re: [mg69611] Plotting with arbitary precision????
  • From: gardyloo <gardyloo at mail.wsu.edu>
  • Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:46:01 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <200609171058.GAA28884@smc.vnet.net>

I would guess that Ted Ersek's PrecisionPlot package will make things
easy. It's downloadable from
http://library.wolfram.com/infocenter/MathSource/715/

   Good luck!
           C.O.

lcw1964 wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am a long time user of another system who has been given the chance
> to try out Mathematica 5.2, and I must admit in some regards I like it
> better, though it handles floating point computation (which I am most
> interested in) in a way that takes some getting used to for me.
>
> I am using the MiniMaxApproximation routine in the Numerical Math package,
> and am interested in generating error curves from the results.  I have
> figured out how to invoke arbitrary precision in the MiniMaxApproximation
> routine with the WorkingPrecision option, so I am not confined to
> Machine Precision.
>
> However, the problem comes with the plotting. In a very good rational
> approximation for Exp[x] I have a maximum relative error of, say, about
> 10^-22. Let's call it RatApp. If I try to plot (RatApp-Exp[x])/Exp[x]
> on my interval of approximation, I don't get a nice smooth double
> ripple error curve like I should. I get a noisy mess confined to
> about +/- 10^-17. Which is precisely what I should get since Plot uses
> only machine precision (not the 30 or so digits of arbitary working
> precision specified) when generating plots. Since the numerator of my
> error function will differ only in the 22nd digit or so and beyond,
> the subtlety of the subtraction is lost.
>
> Online help for Plot doesn't seem to provide an arbitrary precision
> "override" to get over this issue. In the other system, one simply had
> to increase the Digits setting since everything is done in software
> floating point anyway--slower, but easier to use. Is there any way in
> Mathematica to plot a function that requires such high precision in
> interim calculations so that the plot is accurate?
>
> Many thanks in advance,
>
> Les
>
>
>   



  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: Why is the negative root?
  • Next by Date: RE: Plotting with arbitary precision????
  • Previous by thread: Plotting with arbitary precision????
  • Next by thread: Re: Plotting with arbitary precision????