[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Simplification with Integers assumption
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg74737] Re: Simplification with Integers assumption
*From*: "Sem" <sarner2006-sem at yahoo.it>
*Date*: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 00:25:53 -0400 (EDT)
*References*: <eunqc2$7ic$1@smc.vnet.net>
Hi,
I tried in Math 4 (WinXP) your expression:
In[1]:= FullSimplify[ Sum[ n! / (2*p)! / (n - 2*p)! , {p, 1, Infinity}]
, {n > 0 && n \[Element] Integers}]
Out[1]= -1 + 2^(-1+n)
In[2]:= Simplify[ Sum[ n! / (2*p)! / (n - 2*p)! , {p, 1, Infinity}] , {n
> 0 &&
n \[Element] Integers}]
Out[2]= (-2+2^n) n! / (2 Gamma[1+n])
Math 5.2 makes me puzzled!
Regards, Sem.
"did"
> On Mathematica 5.2 Windows, with the 4 similar commands:
>
> Simplify[ Sum[ n! / (2*p)! / (n - 2*p)! , {p, 1, Infinity} ] ,
> Assumptions -> n > 0]
>
> FullSimplify[ Sum[ n! / (2*p)! / (n - 2*p)! , {p, 1, Infinity} ] ,
> Assumptions -> n > 0]
>
> Simplify[ Sum[ n! / (2*p)! / (n - 2*p)! , {p, 1, Infinity} ] ,
> Assumptions -> n > 0 && n =E2=88=88 Integers]
>
> FullSimplify[ Sum[ n! / (2*p)! / (n - 2*p)! , {p, 1, Infinity}] ,
> Assumptions -> n > 0 && n =E2=88=88 Integers]
>
>
> I get the different answers:
>
> Out[1]= -(-2 + 2^n) n! Gamma[n] Sin[n Pi] / (2 Pi)
>
> Out[2]= -1 + 2^(-1+n)
>
> Out[3]= 0
>
> Out[4]= 0
>
> Outputs 1 & 2 look OK, but 3 & 4 are not. It seems that, with the
> assumption n Integer,
> Mathematica simplifies Sin[n Pi] by 0, omitting that Gamma[-n] is
> infinite.
> Is it the expected behavior?
>
> In this example, the simplest form can be obtained without imposing n
> Integer (I
> presume it's the correct answer), but in other situations it will be
> required. What
> is the safe way to do it?
>
> Thanks
>
>
Prev by Date:
**Series and order**
Next by Date:
**Re: Timing in Mathematica**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Simplification with Integers assumption**
Next by thread:
**Re: Simplification with Integers assumption**
| |