MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: presence of Wolfram Research in this mailing list

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg79663] Re: presence of Wolfram Research in this mailing list
  • From: David Bailey <dave at Remove_Thisdbailey.co.uk>
  • Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 05:05:59 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <f8f3fi$ef$1@smc.vnet.net> <f8h48p$6n2$1@smc.vnet.net>

Jens-Peer Kuska wrote:
> Hi Murray,
> 
> it should so, because there is not printed documentation
> of all the new stuff, and the help center is, friendly spoken
> unorganized, the users can't help their self.
> 
> Regards
>    Jens
> 
> Murray Eisenberg wrote:
>> Is it my imagination or is it reality that, since the release of 
>> Mathematica 6.0, responses by Wolfram Research staff to posts have been 
>> considerably more frequent than before?
>>
>> If so, then thank you!  (We need it.)
> 
I really hope some people at Wolfram are reading all the comments here 
about the documentation centre (and its contents), and are frantically 
fixing it! I really think this should be top priority - there is a lot 
of functionality in 6.0 that is very hard to access, and I would not 
like to be a newbie faced with 6.0 and no equivalent of the old bible!

David Bailey
http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk


  • Prev by Date: Re: Module inside Module. Conflict between inner Module local variable
  • Next by Date: Re: FindRoot[] with mixed complex and real variables?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: Module inside Module. Conflict between inner Module local variable
  • Next by thread: RE: How do you set up third party (or your own) packages?