Re: Re: Intensive numerical calculations
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg80230] Re: [mg80152] Re: Intensive numerical calculations
- From: Gerry Flanagan <flanagan at materials-sciences.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 04:18:51 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <f9p5hh$rb6$1@smc.vnet.net> <200708141051.GAA08201@smc.vnet.net>
I've written a couple of my own, including a fairly intensive 3D FEM solution that was part of an iterative loop. After we replaced some bits of Fortran-like code with more natural Mathematica, the speed was similar to a fully compiled code. Ultimately, you can't compete with a large scale commercial FEM because of things like memory management, but for special purpose analysis, by all means go for it. Gerry F. dimitris wrote: > On 13 , 11:42, Cristian <LumisrobToglique... at yahoo.com> wrote: > >> How much is it distant Mathematica from the speed of the c++ language >> compiled ? >> Will it ever be possible to realize a program fem inside Mathematica? >> Thanks >> Cristian >> > > Hi. > > Take a look here: > > http://www.imtek.de/simulation//mathematica/IMSweb/imsTOC/Lectures%20and%20Tips/Simulation%20I/FEM_introDocu.html > > and > > http://www.imtek.de/simulation//mathematica/IMSweb/ > > Regards > Dimitris > > > >
- References:
- Re: Intensive numerical calculations
- From: dimitris <dimmechan@yahoo.com>
- Re: Intensive numerical calculations