Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
MathGroup Archive
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Intensive numerical calculations

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg80392] Re: Intensive numerical calculations
  • From: Yaroslav Bulatov <yaroslavvb at>
  • Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:01:37 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <f9s445$all$><fabgog$id8$>

Efficiency can vary depending on your implementation. For instance
here's a range of solutions to the problem of sampling markov chains,
and their execution times varies by a factor of more than 2000. The
fastest solution had similar runtime to optimized C code.

On Aug 20, 12:44 am, Cristian <LumisrobToglique... at> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 11:36:37 +0000 (UTC), Bill Rowe
> <readnews... at> wrote:
> >On 8/13/07 at 4:33 AM, LumisrobToglique... at (Cristian)
> >wrote:
> >>How much is it distant Mathematica from the speed of the c++
> >>language compiled ?
> >A well written program in a compiled language like C++ will
> >always execute much faster than a similar program written in
> >Mathematica code. But I strongly believe this type of comparison
> >isn't useful.
> I also thought so but if I have to make intensive calculations I have
> to turn to c++, matlink etc.............then boh....
> >The execution speed advantage of C++ is more than
> >offset by the development time for the program.
> true on light calculations
> not true for greater projects
> >=46or any non-trivial program written in Mathematica code, you
> >will be making use of Mathematica function that would have to be
> >re-written in C++ code.And even if this is not the case, things
> >that take several lines of C++ code tend to take much fewer
> >lines of code in Mathematica.
> But if these objects I cannot use them to perhaps make intensive
> calculations it was better that I immediately wrote them in c++ ..imho
> >This is an inherent advantage of
> >using a higher level functions available in Mathematica and not
> >available in C++.
> scientific interpreters exist  also for the c++ with numerical libraries....
> then at the end.... boh
> cristian

  • Prev by Date: Re: Manipulate with Wrapping SetterBars
  • Next by Date: Re: Interpolation of data to form a parametric curve
  • Previous by thread: Re: Intensive numerical calculations
  • Next by thread: Re: Intensive numerical calculations