|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: JLink
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg80509] Re: JLink
- From: David Bailey <dave at Remove_Thisdbailey.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 06:28:19 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <faj473$8h6$1@smc.vnet.net>
dh wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Mathematica 6 comes with an outdated Java. Therefore, it may be
>
> necessary to use a newer version. A clumsy solution is to change the
>
> Java in the installation. However, there was a better method that worked
>
> before v6:
>
> InstallJava takes an option "CommandLine" that specifies a command line
>
> to start Java. In version 6 this does no more work correctly. If I say:
>
> InstallJava[CommandLine->"name of new java"]
>
> the old Java of mathematica is loaded, despite the option. However, if I
>
> prevent mathematica to find the java executable by renaming the
>
> corresponding folder, the correct java is now loaded.
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
I suspect this is related to the fact that Java is now loaded at kernel
startup - presumably to run the packlet code.
Just out of interest, what new features of Java 6 do you want to access
via J/Link?
David Bailey
http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk
Prev by Date:
Re: ListSurfacePlot3D in Mathematica Version 6
Next by Date:
recording singularities of NDSolve
Previous by thread:
Re: JLink
Next by thread:
Re: JLink
|