|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: a definite integral
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg83848] Re: a definite integral
- From: Bhuvanesh <lalu_bhatt at yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 04:11:50 -0500 (EST)
That is indeed a bug. A workaround is to specify more stringent assumptions on z:
Integrate[expression, {u,0,1}, Assumptions->0<z<1]
Thanks for pointing out the issue, and sorry for the inconvenience.
Bhuvanesh,
Wolfram Research
Prev by Date:
Question with ListPlot
Next by Date:
Re: Images chopped during Export
Previous by thread:
a definite integral
Next by thread:
Re: a definite integral
|