Re: FindRoot with complex equations and variables?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg79199] Re: FindRoot with complex equations and variables?
- From: dimitris <dimmechan at yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 04:06:38 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <f7keeg$57m$1@smc.vnet.net>
On 18 , 10:11, AES <sieg... at stanford.edu> wrote: > I have three eqns involving two complex variables w, u and one purely > real variable g. One equation is transcendental and complex (involves > Bessel functions with the complex variables u, w in the arguments); one > is complex-valued but algebraic (can easily be separated into real and > imaginary parts); one is purely real (involves g and the real and > imaginary parts of one of the complex variables). > > Any thoughts on whether FindRoot is likely to be happier (i.e., function > better) dealing with *three* equations (two complex, one real) involving > the three variables w, u and g (including having to write Re[w] and > Im[w] in the real equation), or with four equations (one complex, three > purely real) involving wr, wi, ur, ui and g , all purely real? No satisfactory suggestions can be given if we don't see your equations. Cheers D.S.A.