MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Letting functions not evaluate

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg79447] Re: [mg79416] Letting functions not evaluate
  • From: Bob Hanlon <hanlonr at cox.net>
  • Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 05:45:32 -0400 (EDT)
  • Reply-to: hanlonr at cox.net

f[x_, y_] := Mod[10, x*y] /; IntegerQ[x*y];

{f[3, 2], f[3/2, 6], f[3.14, 2.71], f[x, y]}

{4,1,f(3.14,2.71),f(x,y)}


Bob Hanlon

---- Josh Burkart <jburkart at ucdavis.edu> wrote: 
> Say I have a function f[x], and, for certain values of the argument x, I don't want it to evaluate to anything. E.g., say
> 
> f[x_]:=Mod[10,x],
> 
> and if x is not an integer, then I want f[x] to yield simply f[x]. One way to achieve this is through pattern matching, i.e.,
> 
> f[x_Integer]:=Mod[10,x]
> 
> Although this works perfectly in this example, it is somewhat limited. For instance, if I have a function taking two arguments and I want to perform some check on both arguments together to see whether the function should evaluate or not, pattern matching won't work. E.g.,
> 
> g[x_,y_]:=Mod[10,x*y]
> 
> only if x*y is an integer (even if x and y individually aren't integers). I think there's some way to do this more generally than pattern matching, since for instance if I enter
> 
> In[11]:= Integrate[Gamma[x]^5,x]//FullForm
> Out[11]//FullForm= Integrate[Power[Gamma[x],5],x]
> 
> Mathematica just returns the input unevaluated after taking a little time to decide it's not resolvable. Anyone know how to do this? Using an If[] statement doesn't work, since
> 
> In[1]:= f[x_]:=If[IntegerQ[x], Mod[10, x], f[x]]
> In[4]:= f[3]
> Out[4]= 1
> In[3]:= f[3.3]
> During evaluation of In[3]:= $IterationLimit::itlim: Iteration limit of 4096 exceeded. >>
> Out[3]= Hold[f[3.3]]
> 
> results in infinite recursion. HoldForm[] and Defer[] also produce somewhat dissatisfactory results, since the FullForm[] of what they return is actually HoldForm/Defer[blah blah].
> 



  • Prev by Date: Re: Letting functions not evaluate
  • Next by Date: Re: Letting functions not evaluate
  • Previous by thread: Re: Letting functions not evaluate
  • Next by thread: Re: Letting functions not evaluate