Re: Re: Re: Locator question
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg79526] Re: [mg79452] Re: [mg79433] Re: Locator question
- From: DrMajorBob <drmajorbob at bigfoot.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 05:40:19 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <f86r55$pc7$1@smc.vnet.net> <200707250930.FAA26363@smc.vnet.net> <f89pve$5jn$1@smc.vnet.net> <200707261030.GAA09683@smc.vnet.net> <12053562.1185538119591.JavaMail.root@m35> <op.tv4rezijqu6oor@monster.gateway.2wire.net> <8266975.1185567612261.JavaMail.root@m35>
- Reply-to: drmajorbob at bigfoot.com
I didn't know Locators existed at ALL, before version 6. Yet this code works in v 5.0.1 and NOT in v 6??? (I have continually updated WinXP and Mathematica 6.0.1.) Bobby On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:15:41 -0500, Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu> wrote: > Under Windows XP with Mathematica 5.0.1, and with the version of > trackPointOnPlot nearest the top of my posting, I see only one locator! > > DrMajorBob wrote: >> That code gives me two locators, neither of them on the curve. One >> can't be "grabbed", but it moves when I move the other one. If I move >> the second locator to the curve, the other also moves to the curve, at >> another point (but sometimes beyond the left limit of the plot). >> Bizarro! >> Am I the only one seeing this? >> Bobby >> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:48:07 -0500, Murray Eisenberg >> <murray at math.umass.edu> wrote: >> >>> Very nice! An observation and a question: >>> >>> 1. Probably it would be more reasonable that the third, optional, >>> argument be not an {x,y} point, but instead the x-coordinate of that >>> point, since the point is supposed to be on the graph anyway. The >>> modification for that is trivial: >>> >>> trackPointOnPlot[f_, {a_, b_}, strt_: Automatic] := >>> Module[{start = strt /. Automatic -> a}, >>> DynamicModule[{p = {start, f[start]}}, >>> Column[{LocatorPane[Dynamic[p, (p = {First@#, f[First@#]}) >>> &], >>> Plot[f[x], {x, a, b}]], Dynamic[p]}]]] >>> >>> 2. Where/how did you discover the "trick" of using Automatic as a >>> default value for an argument? I don't recall seeing that before. >>> >>> Albert wrote: >>>> ...The following is my attempt to solve your issue, it only uses one >>>> definition, but introduces some extra code... >>>> >>>> trackPointOnPlot[f_, {a_, b_}, strt_: Automatic] := >>>> Module[{start = strt /. Automatic -> {a, f[a]}}, >>>> DynamicModule[{p = start}, >>>> Column[{LocatorPane[Dynamic[p, (p = {First@#, f[First@#]}) &], >>>> Plot[f[x], {x, a, b}]], Dynamic[p]}]] >>>> ] >>> >>> Of course, per your suggestion, a simpler way but now using only the >>> x-coordinate as third, optional, argument is: >>> >>> trackPointOnPlot[f_, {a_, b_}, start_] := >>> DynamicModule[{p = {start, f[start]}}, >>> Column[{LocatorPane[Dynamic[p, (p = {First@#, f[First@#]}) >>> &], >>> Plot[f[x], {x, a, b}]], Dynamic[p]}]] >>> >>> trackPointOnPlot[f_, {a_, b_}] := trackPointOnPlot[f, {a, b}, a] >>> >> > -- DrMajorBob at bigfoot.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Locator question
- From: Murray Eisenberg <murray@math.umass.edu>
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Locator question
- References:
- Re: Locator question
- From: Albert <awnl@arcor.net>
- Re: Locator question
- From: Albert <awnl@arcor.net>
- Re: Locator question