Re: A wrong definite integral in 5.0?

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg77229] Re: A wrong definite integral in 5.0?
• From: Valeri Astanoff <astanoff at gmail.com>
• Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 06:45:12 -0400 (EDT)
• References: <f43hau\$301\$1@smc.vnet.net>

```On 5 juin, 13:27, bolud-el-kotur <ke8e... at hotmail.com> wrote:
> I get this result in version 5.0,
>
> >Integrate[Log[1 - 4 x(1 - x)], {x, 0, 1}]
> >-2 + I  Pi
>
> and the same thing if I "declare" the singularity with {x,0,1/2,1}.
>
> Another way to look at the problem is computing,
>
> >Integrate[Log[1 - 4 x(1 - x)], {x, 0, 1/2}]
> >-1
>
> and
>
> >Integrate[Log[1 - 4 x(1 - x)], {x, 1/2, 1}]
> >-1 + I Pi
>
> Since the integrand is symmetric about x=1/2, the result should have
> been the same one (-1) in both cases, and the integral over [0,1]
> should yield -2.
>
> A numerical approach,
>
> >NIntegrate[Log[1 - 4 x(1 - x)], {x, 0, 1/2, 1},
>
>   MaxRecursion -> 100, SingularityDepth -> 20]
>
> >-1.9999997086422834`
>
> gives the correct result, within the numerical accuracy required.

Good day,

It was corrected in version 5.1 :

In[1]:= Integrate[Log[1-4 x(1-x)],{x,0,1}]
Out[1]=-2

In[2]:=\$Version
Out[2]=5.1 for Microsoft Windows (January 28, 2005)

V.Astanoff

```

• Prev by Date: Re: JLink error on startup
• Next by Date: Re: Segregating the elements of a list based on given lower and
• Previous by thread: A wrong definite integral in 5.0?
• Next by thread: Re: A wrong definite integral in 5.0?