MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: workbench and java 1.6 ??

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg74116] Re: [mg74100] workbench and java 1.6 ??
  • From: "Chris Chiasson" <chris at chiasson.name>
  • Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 06:02:40 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <200703101149.GAA28307@smc.vnet.net>

I find that things work better (under windows) when I use Wolfram
products with the JRE that comes with Mathematica. I have set my
JAVA_HOME environment variable to Mathematica's install. I'm sure
there is a smarter way to do it on Windows, but this is good enough
for me. Of course, Linux is different - my distro has tools that I
know how to use for managing the JREs.

On 3/10/07, Alex <axel.kowald at rub.de> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I recently upgraded from java 1.5 to 1.6 and since then I have
> problems using Mathematica workbench. Basically, debugging doesn't work and I
> get error messages like the following. Does this mean the workbench
> doesn't work with 1.6 and if yes, where in the workbench do I specify
> which jre to use ?
>
> Many thanks,
>
>     Alex
>
>
> >From In[404]:=
> JLink`Java::excptn: A Java exception occurred: \
> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: [[Ljava.lang.String;
>         at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(Unknown Source)
>         at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>         at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(Unknown Source)
>         at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
>         at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source).
>
> >From In[404]:=
> JLink`LoadJavaClass::fail: Java failed to load class
> [[Ljava.lang.String;.
> >From In[404]:=
> JLink`JavaNew::argx: Incorrect number or type of arguments to
> constructor for \
> class com.wolfram.eclipse.M\[Ellipsis]MathematicaStackFrame. The
> arguments, \
> shown here in a list, were {blob[x_],1000000031,$Failed,\[Ellipsis]m,
> 5,4}
>
>
>


-- 
http://chris.chiasson.name/


  • Prev by Date: Re: accessing a kernel on a network
  • Next by Date: Weird Print Result
  • Previous by thread: workbench and java 1.6 ??
  • Next by thread: Re: workbench and java 1.6 ??