Re: Re: Mathematica 4.0
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg74404] Re: [mg74327] Re: Mathematica 4.0
- From: "Chris Chiasson" <chris at chiasson.name>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 22:11:51 -0500 (EST)
- References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Or you could subscribe to premier service, always have the latest
version, and be able to use the Eclipse plugin (aka Wolfram
Workbench). OOTH, that costs a lot.
On 3/19/07, Drago Ganic <dganic at vodatel.net> wrote:
> Version 4 was much faster than 3.0 and was also the first major version
> where assumption technology was introduced. But, for example the Mathematica
> Book wasn't changed so much. I think it was the minor of all major versions in
> terms of changes to the end user.
> To me, the biggest changes where 3.0 and 5.1.
> If you have 3.0 I suggest to stick to it and change to 6.0 which should be a
> huge improvement (something like 3.0 or even bigger).
> "dimitris" <dimmechan at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:etikqh$j8m$1 at smc.vnet.net...
> >I will add to Chris's reply that version 3 was like a revolution
> > compare to 2.2 for example.
> > This evolution was not so advanced (in my point of view!) from version
> > 3 to version 4.
> > A good book mentioning the changes taken place in versions 3 and 4 is
> > the
> > Beginer's Guide to Mathematica version 4 by Glynn and Gray.
> > Also you can take a look in the following links
> > http://www.wolfram.com/products/mathematica/newin4/
> > http://www.wolfram.com/products/mathematica/newin4/new_list.html
> > However to answer your question completely you have to point out your
> > major area of applications and in what degree you used Mathematica.
> > For example if you are interested in numerical
> > computations in version 4 the introduction of packed arrays took place
> > resulting
> > in considerable decrease in computations timings.
> > Kind Regards
> > Dimitris
> > =CF/=C7 Thomas Dickens =DD=E3=F1=E1=F8=E5:
> >> Hi,
> >> I use Mathematica 3.0 at home. I can't afford to buy 5.2, but have
> >> noticed a copy of 4.0 for sale. Are the differences between 3..0 ->
> >> 4.0 worthwhile?
> >> I know this is a question with no single answer, I just wanted some
> >> opinions!
> >> Thanks,
> >> Tom
Prev by Date:
Re: Initialization cell appearance
Next by Date:
Re: Normal for Limit : Example
Previous by thread:
Re: Mathematica 4.0
Next by thread:
Re: Mathematica 4.0