[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Self-teaching snag
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg74601] Re: [mg74556] Self-teaching snag
*From*: leigh pascoe <leigh at cephb.fr>
*Date*: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 04:10:37 -0500 (EST)
*References*: <200703260704.CAA11373@smc.vnet.net>
Todd Allen wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to refresh my skills in basic problem
> solving using Mathematica, but am running into some
> difficulties which are beginning to make me suspicious
> of Mathematica itself. (I probably should be
> suspicious of my own brain...but you know how that is
> :-)
>
> Here is the scenario: I have written a basic function
> to tell me what percentage of battery power will
> remain in a battery after x number of days, provided
> that we start with a full charge and lose 5% of that
> charge per day.
>
> If you execute the following code in Mathematica
> (V5.1):
>
> charge[0]=1.0 (* 100% *);
> charge[day_]:=(charge[day-1]-(0.05*charge[day-1]));
> charge[20]
>
> I receive an output of 0.358486 for my query at the 20
> day mark.....so, no problem so far.
>
> However, when I try to ask for the output at
> charge[35], mathematica seems to enter an endless
> calculation. I've let the computer run for as long as
> 5 minutes without getting an answer. Is there
> something wrong with my function, my version of
> Mathematica or something else I haven't considered?
>
>
> Additionally,
>
> When I try the following:
>
> In[145]:=
> Solve[charge[day]==0.15,day];
>
> Mathematica gives me the error:
> "$RecursionLimit::reclim: Recursion depth of 256
> exceeded."
>
> I am trying to ask Mathematica to tell my how many
> days it takes to reduce the battery power to 15
> percent, but I must be messing something up??
>
> If anyone has any pointers, I'd certainly appreciate
> it, because I am a little stuck right now.
>
> Best regards,
> Todd Allen
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
> (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
> http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
>
>
>
>
>
This is not exactly an answer to your question, but recursive
definitions are notoriously inefficient. However your basic problem is
that you are mixing a function that is defined for integers and trying
to solve an equation whose solution is not an exact multiple of days.
Similarly when you try to find charge[30] you are probably suffering
from rounding errors due to machine precision and never arriving at the
root of your recursion (charge[0]). For example if you try to evaluate
charge[30.00000000000000001] Ma will never arrive at a value by the
recursive search.
Your problem is easily soluble if you formulate it directly as a
continuous variable as follows.
charge[x]:=.95^x;
charge[30]
for the first part,
or
Solve[ch[x]\[Equal].15,x]
for the second.
with a pencil and paper x=Log[.15]/Log[.95]=36.9857, which is the answer
returned by Solve.
I hope this helps.
Leigh
Prev by Date:
**Re: Self-teaching snag**
Next by Date:
**Re: Self-teaching snag**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Self-teaching snag**
Next by thread:
**Re: Re: Self-teaching snag**
| |