Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2007
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Multi-core Support in Mathematica 5.2

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg74651] Re: Multi-core Support in Mathematica 5.2
  • From: Antti Penttilä@smc.vnet.net
  • Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 05:32:24 -0500 (EST)
  • Organization: University of Helsinki
  • References: <esom9f$eok$1@smc.vnet.net> <eufprp$7c8$1@smc.vnet.net>

Hi,

It's not rubbish - it uses multi-core via some linear algebra packages 
(from Intel?) where multi-core is "easy" and safe to implement. You can 
check if your system is properly configured by running e.g. 
SingularValueDecomposition[] on a large random square matrix. If 
multi-core support is on, MathKernel will reach ~100% CPU-load. If not, 
check that the OMP_NUM_THREADS environment variable is set to 2.

General multi-core support is very hard to implement, because inside 
loops (Do,Table,etc.) the code can change the values of some variables 
that affect later iterations. Still, I suppose that we will see more 
parallelized code in the future, since the processors are going into 
multi-core systems (>2 cores per system).

Antti

Daniel wrote:
> So basically the "touted" multi-core support is a load of rubbish.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> dwadding at atl.lmco.com wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Wolfram advertises version 5.2 as being multi-core capable.  When I
>> use the standard vectorized operations I can only get things to run on
>> one core.  Can some one tell me exactly which Mathematica functions
>> can actually exploit multi-core?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel
> 
> 


  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: Which Mathematica product
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: Sequence as a universal UpValue
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: Re: Multi-core Support in Mathematica 5.2
  • Next by thread: Re: look at this problem